LMbox
Vos données restent chez vous. Book a demo
← All agents
Law firms pilot v0.1.0

Conclusions Drafter

Drafts 80% of a legal writing (court conclusions, memo, letter) from a short brief + the case-file exhibits. The lawyer arbitrates the 20% that needs judgement. Saves 3-5 hours per writing, ~200 writings/year/lawyer.

3-5 h
par écriture juridique

Across 200 writings/year/lawyer × 20 lawyers: 12,000-20,000 hours recovered, ~€3-5M of time freed at billable rate. The lawyer always remains signatory and decision-maker — the agent never signs.

The problem

Writing court conclusions is 30-50% of a litigation lawyer's time. And 80% of that writing is structurally repetitive.

A 30-page set of conclusions at the Paris TJ = 4 to 6 hours of pure writing, plus review. Most of the content is mechanical: factual recap with exhibit citations, statement of claims, legal syllogism, case law citations, quantified prayers, dispositif.

The high-value work — tactical choice, strategic judgement, tone, legal nuance — is 20% of the time but 100% of the value. The rest is junior time billed at hourly rate.

Conclusions Drafter produces the **80% draft**. The lawyer reviews, arbitrates the 20%, signs. Writing time drops from 4-6h to 1h. Inferences are marked `[to validate]`, jurisprudence comes from `search_jurisprudence` (never made up), exhibits are cited by their exact number.

How it works

Four steps, from incoming document to human decision.

  1. 1

    Lawyer brief received

    3-15 lines: jurisdiction, type of writing, client, opposing party, main claim, legal basis, deadline. Plus the list of indexed case-file exhibits.

  2. 2

    Firm-style calibration + case-law lookup

    Agent calls `search_style_house` to fetch 2-3 recent firm writings (citation conventions, tone, idioms). Then `search_jurisprudence` for relevant rulings to cite.

  3. 3

    Structured draft generation

    RAPPEL DES FAITS (each statement cited), DISCUSSION (legal syllogism), PRÉTENTIONS, DISPOSITIF — in CPC format. Each inference marked `[to validate]`, each exhibit cited by number.

  4. 4

    Human arbitration + signature

    The lawyer reviews the 20% needing judgement (tactical choice, tone, validation), corrects, signs. The agent always ends on `Maître [lawyer — TBC]` — no automatic signature.

Architecture

Tools, connectors, deployment.

Tools (function-calling)

  • search_pieces
  • search_jurisprudence
  • search_style_house

Optional connectors

  • sharepoint (optional)
  • outlook (optional)
Deployment via the SDK
$ lmbox agent deploy ./conclusions-drafter \
    --box BOX-XXX \
    --token "$LMBOX_BOX_API_KEY" \
    --api https://api.lmbox.eu

Other catalogue agents

Law firms pilot

NDA Reviewer

Reads each incoming NDA, identifies non-standard clauses against the firm's internal template library, drafts an amendment memo for the responsible partner.

1 h 30
Measured gain · par contrat
All sectors pilot

Meeting Summarizer

Turns a raw meeting transcript (Teams, Zoom, locally-transcribed audio) into a structured CR: decisions made, action items with owner and deadline, open questions.

20-40 min
Measured gain · par réunion

Try Conclusions Drafter on the public demo.

One-click sign-in. You see the agent installed on a real LMbox, with its system prompt loaded and audit chain live.